Bittrex provides statement on NYDFS decision to deny BitLicense

Earlier today, the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) released a statement regarding the denial for the applications of crypto exchange company Bittrex to engage in business and money transmission activity in New York due to failure to meet the licensing requirements of DFS.

The statement said it was primarily due to deficiencies in Bittrex’s BSA/AML/OFAC compliance program; deficiency in meeting the Department’s capital requirement; and deficient due diligence and control over Bittrex’s token and product launches.

Now, effective April 11, 2019, Bittrex must immediately cease operating in New York State and within 60 days wind down its business in New York, including transferring positions and transactions, and provide for the safe custody of assets involving New York residents, as appropriate. Bittrex’s customer base of approximately 1.67 million users is spread across multiple countries and approximately 40 states, and includes approximately 35,000 New York consumers.

To this decision, Bittrex communicated the following:

“Bittrex is saddened and disappointed in today’s decision by the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), which we believe harms rather than protects New York customers. Bittrex fully disputes the findings of the NYDFS in today’s decision. We have worked diligently with NYDFS to address their questions and meet their requirements since first applying for our BitLicense in August of 2015. First, and foremost, we adamantly disagree with NYDFS’ claims and allegations in regard to our anti-money laundering (AML) and compliance practices. Corporate responsibility is in our DNA and our commitment to regulatory and compliance guidelines is second to none.”

More specifically, today’s letter contains several factual inaccuracies that Bittrex felt must be addressed: 

Internal Policies, Procedures, and Controls

• Bittrex implemented transaction monitoring, and is in the process of fully automating that process
• Bittrex maintains a risk assessment framework, approved by outside counsel, and fully trains all company employees in its AML policies and procedures
• Bittrex screens for SDNs when a customer opens an account, and tracks all SDN updates from OFAC, checking our customer upon notice; it is enabling continuously automated screening with a new system going into effect this quarter
• The Iranian customers referenced in the letter were reported to OFAC in January 2018; Bittrex says it does not have and has never had any North Korean customers

Customer Due Diligence

• The sample included by NYDFS was taken from 2017. Since then, Bittrex says it has mandated full customer identification, including the requirement that all customers submit government-issued ID and a “selfie” which is then compared against the ID to ensure a match; the company says it has disabled all accounts not meeting this enhanced verification standard. This is the industry standard not only in virtual currency but also in traditional banking
• The letter mentions accounts with names that did not match. There were less than a dozen of these names in total and none of these accounts were ever active and none of these accounts ever made a trade. The fact that these accounts were unable to trade demonstrates the effectiveness of our diligence process, rather than a deficiency as NYDFS alleges

Additionally, Bittrex felt that today’s NYDFS letter withholds key context from the review process. In January of this year, NYDFS presented to Bittrex a supervisory agreement that, if agreed to, would have resulted in the issuance of a BitLicense and a Money Transmission License.

There were significant issues with the agreement:

• Coin Restrictions & Regulatory Overreach – The agreement restricted the coins Bittrex could offer to New York residents to only ten coins, and imposed restrictions on the process by which Bittrex could offer new coins. This would have prohibited Bittrex from listing coins that are offered to New York residents by other BitLicensees. NYDFS reserved the right to order us to withdraw coins at any time. Additionally, DFS would be able to prohibit offering tokens to NY residents, even if other NY BitLicense holders were able to offer the tokens
• Unrealistic Capital Requirements – NYDFS imposed capitalization requirements far in excess of that of any other state despite Bittrex implementing security and cold storage procedures. These requirements were based upon a pre-existing formula of hot wallet v. cold wallet storage that did not take into account the broad range of coins that Bittrex lists and ignored the risks of frequently moving assets from hot to cold storage. Bittrex offered a bond to cover the entire capitalization of all New York customers (in addition to the $1 million bond NYDFS requires for all licensees), but that was rejected
• Business Harm – The agreement would have required Bittrex to obtain NYDFS approval to form or acquire any other entity. This would have significantly restricted our ability to create the appropriate corporate vehicles to expand in other jurisdictions